Tag Archive for asbestos exposure

Climate Changes Brings Asbestos Dangers to Light

The danger of climate change has been making itself apparent in recent years. As natural disasters occur more frequently, they bring about significant economic, financial, and environmental destruction, as well as several dangers toward human health and safety. According to the Australian government, another issue that comes up after a natural disaster is the increased risk of asbestos exposure. Concerns are growing among Australians as the occurrence of earthquakes and floods is increasing.

Frequently used in construction up until the 1970s, asbestos is virtually harmless if left undisturbed, but becomes incredibly dangerous otherwise. When asbestos is moved, it releases microscopic fibers into the air, which can then be inhaled and embedded into the lungs. These fibers are often the cause of mesothelioma cancer, a disease that remains dormant in the body for decades after asbestos exposure before severely affecting the lining of the lungs. When the dangers of asbestos became known its use became heavily restricted or banned in most western countries, but many structures containing the substance still exist. As a precaution, governments have put strict regulations on the handling and removal of asbestos in order to minimize the risk.

According to Geoff Fray, Chairman of Australia’s Asbestos Management Review, natural disasters pose a serious health risk in their ability to release asbestos into the environment. The government has raised concerns that this level of exposure will eventually lead to increased rates of mesothelioma cancer and lung cancer, so the review is making efforts to raise awareness and tighten up guidelines for preventing exposure. As it stands, around 600 people in Australia die from mesothelioma annually.

Professor Bogda Koczwara, President of the Clinical Oncological Society of Australia, said that this rate is increasing.

“This is a highly lethal cancer with very poor survival, yet many people don’t realize they are exposing themselves to asbestos when they pull up their lino [sic] floors or recover relics from their flooded home.”

These concerns are also relevant to the United States, whose regulation of asbestos is strict without having outright banned the substance. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to stress that people should avoid handling any damaged material should their homes and businesses be affected by a natural disaster. People should wait until emergency crews arrive to remove any hazardous material.

At the current rate of exposure, mesothelioma cancer is expected to peak within the next decade. The hope is that regular compliance with safety restrictions will eventually eradicate or at least significantly reduce asbestos cancers.

New Asbestos Legislation in Ireland

Northern Ireland’s Finance Minister has just approved new legislation that will allow its residents to claim compensation for pleural mesothelioma contracted following asbestos exposure.

According to Finance Minister Sammy Wilson, the new legislation will take effect on December 14th. It overturns a 2007 decision by the House of Lords stating that victims of asymptomatic, asbestos-related conditions could not claim compensation. £2.5 million has already been set aside for claims.

In Scotland, a similar ruling came before the UK Supreme Court after a long-running challenge initiated by insurance providers.

In October of this year, the Supreme Court rejected the insurers’ claims that the legislation infringed on human rights.

On Monday, Sammy Wilson emphasized the importance of this legislation.

“…I always believed that the policy objectives of the Act were just and fair and that belief has now been vindicated by the ruling of the UK Supreme Court in relation to Scottish legislation.

“The 2011 Act may be short and targeted, but it is a vitally important Act, which seeks to ensure the continued availability of a method of redress for ordinary working men and women.”

Pleural plaques, caused by asbestos exposure, are small, localized areas of fibrosis that occur in the membrane of the lungs. Before 2007, it was possible to award damages to victims of negligent asbestos exposure even in the absence of symptoms. This new legislation makes this a reality again.

“It must be devastating to be told that you have developed a conditions as a result of having been exposed to asbestos. To be told then that you couldn’t claim compensation for that condition would clearly make the matter worse.” said Wilson.

“The 2011 Act essentially reverses that decision and, whilst the ability to pursue a claim in damages will not fully compensate for any wrong which was done, I hope that those affected will derive some comfort from the fact that the wrongdoer can once again be held to account.”

Asbestos exposure is one of the only known causes of pleural plaques and mesothelioma cancer, both of which affect the lining of the lungs. Left undisturbed, asbestos is virtually harmless, but disturbing it releases microscopic, needle-like fibers that can then be inhaled and embedded into the lungs. Mesothelioma cancer and other asbestos related conditions often do not appear until decades after exposure. Though the use of asbestos is heavily regulated or altogether banned in Western countries, mesothelioma cancer continues to be an issue, as they are the result of asbestos exposure that occurred when the substance was widely used.